Thank you, I will review the pages in question over the next few days …
In my opinion, such strict prohibiting of using any little fragments of your information harms to your site because your are loosing opportunity to obtain additional links and popularity to your project.
I don’t agree. The fragments may have been 25% of the entire page, but they were 100% of the bus description section ~ I can’t allow that. Also, I lose control of my work as it’s copied to your page, as other web sites see it as open source [public domain].
I would add that, my link should have been added on your pages as a “to see a detailed description of this bus see this page” in the first place, instead of coping my work. If you copy my work and I later find and correct a mistake, your readers are left with the wrong data. Also you should not have assumed that because one web site used a ‘copyright’ notice as a page footer that I was also doing that ~ I should have been contacted first.
I’ve been working on this site for years, beginning in 1997, spending thousands of hours. You spend a few minutes coping parts of it. I spent half a day working up the PCI express pin-out pages; it’s copied to your site in minutes. Again I understand what I’m writing, I can see and correct my mistakes ~ if you need to copy it, that tells me you do not understand what resides on your pages ..
I could go on and on, but the bottom line is to keep your site current and correct, you would have to visit and copy my site on a per/month basis as I up-date my pages to correct errors ~ the correct approach would have been to have a link to my site, instead of taking my data.
your are loosing opportunity to obtain additional links and popularity to your project
Again, my link should have been provided to indicate a site providing detailed information [without my data]. If my data is provided instead of my link then I have to assume that there is an attempt to redirect my visitors which would have been directed to my site to another site.
Or, I would rather have no link if it requires coping my work.
your are loosing opportunity to obtain additional links and popularity to your project.
Maybe, your site is rated as a 3 on goggle, my site is a 6 or 7. So your links do me little good; but I have to say again, your coping data you can not verify [because I wrote it] and hope I do not up-date ~ because you don’t understand the text.
You have ‘links by goggle’ on your site which tells me your trying to make some money by site hits which would have based on my work, not your work.
Are you satisfied with applied changes? May I consider that there are no interfacebus.com copyright violations at my site?
Give me a few days to reply, I get many e-mails
