Home ->
ZEPHYR Magazine -> Issue 30
T H E
Z E P H Y R
__ M A G A Z I N E
{__]++++++++++++++++++++++++++[]
Issue #30 11-3-86
A weekly electronic magazine for users of
THE ZEPHYR II BBS
(Mesa, AZ - 602-894-6526)
owned and operated by T. H. Smith
Editor - Gene B. Williams
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. You may share this magazine with your friends under the .
. condition that the magazine remain complete and intact, .
. with no editing, revisions or modifications of any kind, .
. and including this opening section and statement. .
. If you like the magazine, our Sysop and I would appreciate.
. it if you would let your friends know where they can log .
. in to find the magazine (and incidentally one of the .
. finest BBSs in the country!). .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) 1986
THIS ISSUE:
You'll make two major category purchases in your life. The
most major will be a house. Second would be a car. Everything
else in comparison is relatively minor (although for many of
us on the board here, the cost of a computer system can also be
a major purchase).
My own personal policy is to spend some time on any purchase
of more than $50. When I bought a camera, I spent several months
researching brands and models. My computer system cost even more
than my camera equipment, so and accordingly I spent even more
time in research before making that purchase.
When it comes time to buy a car, you're almost certain to be
spending several hundred dollars even for a semi-broken-down used
mess, and very possibly more than $10,000.
And yet, a surprising number of people just go out and plunk
down their money without taking the time to find out if they are
going to be spending their time on the road - or in the repair
shop (or the junk yard).
BUYING A CAR
Next to buying a house, the purchase of a car is often one of
the most important buying decisions you'll ever make. You can
make it a pleasant experience - or you can turn it into a long-
lived nightmare.
It's easy to blame any nightmares on the salesperson, on the
previous owner, on the manufacturer, or on anyone or anything
else that happens to be available. Occasionally that's all too
true. At the same time, those who get snookered generally have
brought it on themselves.
Take for example the Chevrolet Camaro. It is one of the most
popular - and one of the most expensive - cars that Chevrolet
has ever produced. People see them zipping down the street and
want one. What they end up with is one of the lowest values in
automotives that there is (according to"Consumer's Guide,"
"Consumer's Digest," and a number of other sources).
A part of the low value can be attributed to the manufacturer
for concentrating on the lines and cosmetics while ignoring
the mechanical soundness of their product. A part can be placed
on the salesmen for bragging up the vehicle to potential
purchasers. The largest part belongs with the purchaser. If he
or she had done their "homework," they wouldn't have been
fooled in the first place. Then Chevrolet would have no choice
but to both drop the price and increase the quality.
The same holds true for the purchase of any vehicle, new or
used.
NOTE: If there are satisfied Camaro owners reading this, my
apologies. This is only an example, and the statistics are not
my own.
HOMEWORK
It is important - critical might be a better description - to
thoroughly find out something about what you have in mind. If
you base your purchase decision on prejudice, you're much more
likely to walk away with an unsatisfactory buy.
That prejudice comes in two flavors - positive and negative.
Positive prejudice is such as wanting a particular make or
model based on how it looks, how it affects your status (internal
or external), or even how your friends have talked. ("Oh, wow,
man, that sure is a sharp car.") An excellent example was the
Dodge Charger and Challenger models of the early 1970s. People
bought them like crazy due primarily to positive prejudice, only
to find out that the electrical systems had been so poorly designed
that owners were quite likely to find themselves stranded.
Negative prejudice is such as saying, "Hey, there's a Ford.
Fix Or Repair Daily. Hahahahaha." (That is NOT an endorsement
for Ford, by the way. They are presently having severe quality
control problems. However, their 1985 trucks for example were
just about the best ever built by anyone - but were passed over
for the most part due to the stigma and jokes and the long standing
Ford reputation for building lousy products.)
Both types can kill you. The first can easily put you behind
the wheel of a pretty but poorly built vehicle. That's a bad
buy at any price. The second can prevent you from buying what
is actually a better vehicle simply because your thoughts have
prevented you from even considering it.
It's not unusual for someone to spend roughly 25% of their
total income on a vehicle. That's a pretty darned important
purchase! It deserves some open minded thinking and research.
There are plenty of ways to accurately research a car or truck.
Publications like "Consumer Reports" is an excellent starting
place. They accept no advertising and no support from the
manufacturers. They have nothing to lose or gain in saying that
a particular make or model is an excellent - or lousy - buy.
Close would be those automotive magazines that regularly
review vehicles. You can generally tell when the writers have
hyped the vehicle, have entered their own prejudices, or have
reported it honestly. Simply page through a few issues. If
every car they test gets raves, or gets knocked to shreds,
something is wrong.
In any case, NEVER accept just one source. Take some time and
see what several sources have to say. Compare them. If 3 or 4
completely different sources say the same basic thing, chances
are pretty good that it's accurate. If one says that a certain
make and model is the best thing on the road, while another calls
it a piece of junk, one of the two - and maybe both - are off
base. (This is fortunately rare.) Go to more sources.
One of your best possible sources is a mechanic who services a
variety of cars. Preferably someone you know well enough, and who
knows you well enough, to give you a straight and reliable answer.
What cars does he see most often and why? Which ones does he
rarely see, and why (in his opinion)?
Now comes people you know who happen to own - or who have
owned - what you have in mind. Someone who has owned and driven
a particular make and model is a pretty good source for
information.
Next in line would be friends who know more about automotives
than you do. The trouble is in determining who actually knows,
and who just likes to THINK that they know. You also have to wade
through their own sets of prejudice.
Which Vehicle?
A part of your homework is that of narrowing the field. What
do you need and why? What do you expect of your car or truck?
Chances are good that those won't be easy questions to answer
simply. You're most likely to end up with a list of things that
are important. Consequently you have to rank your list in some
kind of order of importance.
The primary function of most vehicles is that of transportation.
You want something to get you from one place to another. For
most people this will be the main consideration, and should
consequently mean that your PRIME concern is one of reliability.
If your choice tends to break down every 10 miles, doesn't start
in the morning, etc. etc. - it's not much good for transport.
Closely related would be cost of repairs. You can find parts
for a Toyota or Ford or Chevy just about anywhere. It's going to
take a bit more searching to find a part for a BMW. Buy yourself
a Lambourghini and finding parts is going to be tough. That fancier
car will also make finding a mechanic more difficult - and generally
more expensive.
Back to the use of the vehicle - other than getting you from
place to place, what is its function?
One of the main reasons I bought a new car was because my truck
was no longer needed as a truck. Sure, it was dramatic. A great
big monster of a 4-wheel drive, but used almost exclusively to
drive the long distance into town (I'm WAY out in the boonies) for
grocery shopping. At a maximum of 10 miles per gallon, that's not
what you'd call efficient use.
If we'd been into 4-wheelin' on the desert, or did a lot of
hauling that required a truck, it would have been just fine. But
a big truck used to haul nothing more than bags of groceries
becomes less of an asset. If you're willing to pay the extra for
the relative "status" of a big truck, fine - but realize that you
are doing it, and will be for as long as you own the vehicle.
Do you like having a big truck or a fancified and tricked out
van? Fine. Just realize that you'll pay for it up front and over
time (less mpg and generally higher insurance rates - it all adds
up over time).
The ideal situation is to pick the right vehicle for the right
task. If you commute long distances over good roads and haul nothing
more than school books and maybe a few bags of groceries, you
certainly don't need an 18-wheeler. If you spend your weekends
exploring Baja, you probably don't want to do it in a low-slung
sports car.
It will probably come down to a trade-off. Sure, you'd love to be
getting 40 mpg, but it's tough hauling full sheets of plywood or
hay in a Mazda. You might like the looks and features of a TR-3,
but the lack of a back seat could spell real trouble and make the
vehicle all but useless.
Making the trade-off involves an honest evaluation of your needs.
If you haul heavy materials just once every few years, you can more
cheaply rent a vehicle for those times, or can pay a small delivery
charge. Just because you *might* need to haul some furniture some-
time during the next 3 or 4 years is no reason to buy a truck. If
you go camping a lot - well, it gets tired in a hurry trying to
sleep in the back seat, and expensive in a hurry to rent a cabin
week after week.
The important thing is honesty. Don't be thinking "I'd *like* to
go camping every weekend," when you know damn well that you can't.
New or Used
Due to the ever increasing costs, it's tough to buy a new car.
It's also not necessarily the wisest choice.
Earnhardt has an ad on TV that talks about leasing as opposed to
buying. There's a lot of truth in their statements. Basically, the
greatest depreciation on a vehicle takes place in the first year,
followed closely by the second year, and then the third. After that
it tends to stabilize a little. The value continues to go down, but
not quite as quickly.
Say the vehicle costs $10,000 new. After just one year you'll be
lucky to get $8000. At the end of the second year it will be worth
something like $6500, if that much. If you can get $5000 after 3
years you'll be doing very well. After this, the rate of depreciation
slows considerably.
That vehicle is going to lose about half of the purchase price in
the first 3 years or so. It will take another 7 to 10 years for it
to lose the other half (and it will never be totally without value).
As a general rule of thumb, if you intend to trade-in the vehicle
any more often than each 2-3 years, leasing is likely to be a less
expensive route for you. If you intend to keep that new car for 5
or 10 years, then buying is the better choice.
Buying a used vehicle means that someone else has paid the major
part of the depreciation. It also means that you are buying a car
with little or no warranty on it. You could be "buying someone
else's headaches." Of course, there's no guarantee that even a new
car will run well and reliably - but the chances of trouble increase
as the age the vehicle increases.
Look at the mileage. Again, it's only a general rule of thumb but
the more miles, the more trouble you'll have. It's fairly rare for a
car to last more than 100,000 miles without some serious engine
problems. It's possible that the engine will have to be rebuilt - at
a cost of somewhere between $1000 and $1500. Quite often the car
isn't worth that much. So, if you paid $1500 for that car, and have
to pay $1500 for the rebuild, the car has cost you $3000.
Look at the tires. If you have to replace them, you're facing a
cost of $200 or more. Even more important, though, is to look at
*how* the tires are wearing. If the tread is wearing unevenly,
there's a pretty fair chance that the car has some front end
problems. (And if the car has brand new tires, don't automatically
assume that the former owner is a nice guy thinking of the buyer.
He *could* be trying to hide something.)
Start the engine. It should start quickly and run smooth. Punch
the gas SLIGHTLY to check for hesitation (which could indicate
valve problems, carburetor problems or both). Look at the exhaust.
You shouldn't be able to see it, and it certainly shouldn't be a
blackish-grey in color. Have someone punch and let go on the
accelerator and watch the exhaust again. Look at the exhaust one
more time later after the engine has reached operating temperature.
Check all features for operation. Does the radio work? The
windshield wipers and sprayer? How about the headlights, turn
signals, brake lights and so on? Check everything, and don't be
afraid to ask questions.
A look under the hood probably won't tell you much, but do it
anyway. If nothing else you'll get a general idea of condition, and
you might be able to spot potential problems. Look particularly
for fresh oily spots, such as around the spark plugs, and any
water.
General condition of the vehicle - body, interior and trunk - can
often (but not always) tell you if the vehicle has been abused. If
the cosmetics are a mess, it's a fair bet that the previous owners
didn't care much about the mechanics, either.
Whether the vehicle is new or used, a test drive is critical.
This gives you a chance to test the handling. Pay the most
attention to safety. Is the steering sloppy? Does the car pull
to one side either when driving or braking? Does it brake
smoothly? Does it accelerate smoothly?
Keep in mind the entire time that you could *literally* be betting
your life, and the lives of those around you on the road, on this
vehicle. If it's a junkheap that needs extensive repairs, you'll
also be betting your bankroll.
A "good deal" isn't ALWAYS a good deal. It doesn't do much good
to pay $300 for a car worth $500, only to have it crash, or to
find yourself spending $1500 for a new engine a month later.
Make your choice carefully. Don't let your emotions get in the
way of an intelligent decision.
Spend an extra couple of bucks and get one or more of the guides
on new and/or used car values. (They're even available in grocery
stores.) Then spend a bit of time paging through the want-ads, and
publications such as "Auto Trader" to get an idea of what you can
expect as far as price.
Dealer Vs Private Party
There are advantages and disadvantages to either route. The
dealer is in business to make money, which means that he is bound
to charge more for the same vehicle. (Obviously you can't buy a
brand new car from a private party.) Also, since he is in
business, you generally (but not always) have some legal recourse
if the car isn't "as advertised."
The dealer can - and usually does - offer a warranty. It might
be for only 30 days, but that's at least something. It's very rare
for a private party to offer a warranty. (If he does, GET IT IN
WRITING! A verbal contract is usually binding, but drops on you
the need to prove what was said - a difficult thing at best.)
A private party is almost certain to charge less. You can dicker
and talk to get a better price. (You can do that with the dealer,
too, but keep in mind that the dealer isn't there to break even
and certainly not to lose money.)
That private party will also know more about the vehicle than
will the dealer's salesman. Afterall, he or she has been driving
that vehicle. And they know how well it has been kept up. (All
this assumes, of course, that the person is honest.)
Working out the price is going to be frustrating regardless. The
dealer *knows* the value of that car. There are listings available
to him. Emotions don't play a part in it at all. He looks at those
numbers, figures in what he needs for profit, and that's the
bottom line. Anything above that is additional profit, and the
salesman's job is to do his best to drive the price as far above
the minimum as he can.
DON'T be fooled by the salesman who becomes your long lost best
friend, and the typical ploy of, "We're losing money on this deal."
It's pure bullshit (excuse me - but that's how it is). Think about
it for a moment. If they were constantly just breaking even or
were losing money, that company would be out of business. The
salesman, who earns his living entirely on commission (a percentage
of the sale), would be out of a job REAL fast if he kept losing
money for the company - and he'd soon starve besides.
A very typical technique is for the salesman to make the deal,
then go in to clear it with the manager. Guaranteed - the sales
manager will HAVE to have more money "just to break even."
Once again, think about it for a moment. If that salesman was
constantly making deals that lost money, he'd be fired. That price
the two of you worked out is not a mistake.
At this point let me tell you a story. Before we went in to buy
our new car I did my homework. I knew exactly what my truck was
worth, and exactly what the Mazda was worth - wholesale and retail,
with both high book and low book. So, I went in *knowing* the
deal, including dealership profit. (Hey. You have to be realistic
about it.)
Before the salesman started his sales spiel I told him that I
knew what I wanted, here's my deal, vary it by as much as $5 and
we're walking out. While he was in with the sales manager I told
my wife, "Watch now. He'll come back and want "$500 just to break
even." And that was EXACTLY what happened - quote, unquote.
Even then it wasn't a bad deal, but we stuck to our statement.
Without a word to them, we got up and started to leave. They wanted
to negotiate. We wouldn't.
End result - we got the deal we wanted. They made money on it,
which they should and have to. We got a decent price.
There's no mystery to it. Come to an HONEST figure and value,
and stick to it. Don't put up with any nonsense. (At the same time
if you start with a nonsense figure on your part - a new Mazda, but
you only want to pay $5000 - forget it. You have no bargaining room
there. For this to work, you MUST do your homework first, and you
MUST be willing to accept that the dealer earns a profit.)
The same basic thing applies to the private party. In this case,
you're often facing someone who has an inflated idea of the
vehicle's value. (Look in the paper. You'll find 1971's listed
with an asking price of $3000 and more, right next to more legit
and realistic ads for 1980 models selling for even less.)
If the person starts off with a grossly inflated idea of value,
forget it. You'll never get them down to a reasonable figure. (That
$3000 1971 Ford, for example, that's actually worth more like $600 -
do you think that the owner is going to drop his price by $2400?)
You might be one of those who likes to dicker and trade. If so,
fine and good. Enjoy yourself.
More people are like me. I *hate* to dicker. In fact, I refuse
to do so. (Right, Jay?) But this means, once again, that you do
some realistic homework before starting, and then sticking to
what you know is fair, even if it means losing that item (or having
to keep it for a while longer if you are the seller).
Some Personal Observations
My own first car was a 1961 Ford Falcon. The previous owner had
purchased it new and had barely ever driven it. Trouble was, when
he did drive it he had the tendency to drive it hard. It had a
stick shift. This guy liked to rev it up while riding the clutch.
He would also let it sit for months on end. Even so, it was a very
good bargain, and a tough car.
I then bought a 1968 Triumph GT6 (NOT a 6+). British cars - ALL
of them, and especially those with Lucas Electric - have problems
with their wiring and electric circuits.
Next came a Dodge Charger. That's when I found out that Dodge has
a reputation for electric problems that makes the British cars look
like design dreams.
Front wheel drives, such as with an old Toronodo we drove for a
while, bring on problems all their own. They also tend to be more
expensive to repair.
Then came the Fords for that one company. During 1984 and into
1985 Fords FINALLY became concerned with their growing reputation
for putting out lousy products, and put out a line of trucks that
were rated very highly. The main problem was poor seal of the front
end differential on 4-wheel drives, and continuingly notorious
reputation at least in the Valley for poor service.
After some heavy research we traded off our own Ford truck for
a Mazda. The Toyota Corolla presently has the highest rating of all
vehicles in America as far as reliability; Mazda comes a very close
second - at least for the 323 and 626.
Also highly rated is the Honda Accord, although getting a decent
deal on this particular car is somewhat more difficult.
Surprisingly for a newcomer, the Hyundai has been getting some
very good reviews. Conversely, the Yugo has the WORST crash rating
of any car made. (Tests showed the average repair cost for a crash
of just 5 mph came to $2000.)
Until Next Time
It might be interesting to get some personal experiences on
this topic. What luck and UNluck have you had? Maybe you have a
car that has given you nothing but trouble - or one that has
never broken down at all.
Share that with the rest of us.
Thanks to Reverend Nuclear, I've found a new BBS. It's called
Bear Tracks 2. The phone number is 968-0372. What's so special about
it? It's a BBS set up for writers and would-be writers. (No, I
have nothing at all to do with it except as a user.)
So, if you're into writing, go on over and check it out. They
have a very nice system there, and unique in its function.
Zephyr Magazine is ©
Gene Williams. All rights reserved.