Apollo BBS Archive - November 1988

Apollo BBS Archive - November 28, 1988

$tatus Club Bulletin Board command:$C

Message: 4806
Author: $ Mike Carter
Category: Chit-Chat
Subject: last
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:46:37

It's a W-E-A-P-O-N, you boot-camp refugee!
 
  This is my Weapon,
  and this is my gun.
  This one's for killing,
  and this one's for fun!
 
Now drop and give me 50 !
                                -Mike

Message: 4807
Author: $ Jeannie Innajug
Category: Fire'arms
Subject: Shoot-out
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:02:18

Hey............Everyone..........

The Shoot-out sounds great.  Wish I could have been there!  I was a little
apprehensive when I logged on this morning, wondering how many of you would
be left after the blazing shoot-out!

See Y'aa..............

Jeannie

Message: 4808
Author: $ Jeannie Innajug
Category: Fire'arms
Subject: Shoot-out
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:03:18

Hey..........Jonesey...........

If I had known you could cook, too..................

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!

See Y'aa..............

Jeannie

Message: 4809
Author: $ Ralph Blehm
Category: Get-Togethers
Subject: Shoot out
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 11:02:17

And a good time was had by all.
                   !!!! SHOOT THEM ALL RALPH !!!!

Message: 4810
Author: $ Todd Reese
Category: Question?
Subject: Shoot out
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 12:52:43

Did anyone get shot?

Message: 4811
Author: $ Rod Williams
Category: Answer!
Subject: Todd
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:50:56

        What's a few fingers and toes anyway?

Creative Corner Bulletin Board command:$C

Message: 1955
Author: $ Mike Carter
Category: Chit-Chat
Subject: last
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:48:07

that's because they probably kicked you out of boot-camp or rejected
you before you could learn how to handle a weapon correctly.
 
        -Mike

Message: 1956
Author: $ Rod Williams
Category: Answer!
Subject: Mike
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:52:57

        No, actually I was drafted by the Dallas Selective Service Board but
I hired an attorney and didn't go to Viet Namn in 1962.  That kind of war
sucks.

Bulletin Board command:$C

Message: 55756
Author: $ Bob Thornburg
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: James Hawley
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 20:43:55

Re: 90% of child molestors are Christians.  78% of violent crimes are
committed
by Christians.

99% of all bad people eat mashed potatoes too.  So what does that prove?
Maybe we should outlaw mashed potatoes??

Message: 55757
Author: $ Bob Thornburg
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: J.L.
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 20:58:37

Re: "For me, discrediting Christianity is something that's already been
thoroughly done."

Huh?  Maybe in your own eyes it is discredited, but there are a lot of
Christians on the Apollo that know otherwise.

Message: 55758
Author: $ Mike Carter
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Rod on God
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:44:31

"I say that some diehard religionist put this illegal saying on our money."
 
I say that some diehard maggot - for -brains wrote the above.
In GOD WE TRUST is ***NOT*** an "Illegal saying" ; this goes to show how
pitifully demented your concepts of freedom really are.
You anti-religious fervor is revealing the total ignorance you wallow in.
Since you loved Burkarts analogy so much, read this one, it's the same
just a different topic;
If 200 million Americans wanted a Tax break and 50 million did NOT, you're
saying that there SHOULD BE NO TAX BREAK to show respect for the minorities.
UP YOURS, PINHEAD!
If you *HATE* God so much, HATE America so much, HATE money so much and
simply can't stand to live in a country where "In God We Trust" is printed
in #4 outline print (Real BIG, eh ROddy boy?) then perhaps you should 
respect the wishes of the rest and move elsewhere. 
There you could print your own, smoke and roll your own and be happy and
own a free house, get free food, pork and poke every blonde haired
papoose that moved and you could even say that you're KING! Yeah! POPE!
But if you *WANT* to stay here so much, why not attempt to respect others
and stop being so selfish, el minority.
                                                -Mike

Message: 55759
Author: $ Mike Carter
Category: Answer!
Subject: Burkhart
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:04:29

Your idea that the Majority DOESN't rule reminds me of "Mine Kopf".
While minority rights should never be overlooked, your argument
states that individual rights is higher priority than a majority vote.
I believe you need to re-asses your position on this.
 
The same illegitimate ideals can be found in a lot of idiots behind the
wheel on roadways. They believe that they have a RIGHT to be there, doing
the speed they want, when they want, no matter who or what effects it
may have on the majority of drivers. Such problems like burkhart-thinking
drivers cause accidents, traffic jams and kill millions of people world-wide
each year. Like Granny in the left lane doing 45 mph.
At least a country that has been stated as being 10-years behind on
technology and overall living conditions, like Australia, has a few
folks who understand that it is no good to be "Dead Right".
 
        -Mike

Message: 55760
Author: $ Mike Carter
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Atheists
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:11:20

ROd propounds almost every known atheist has a perfect mind and is
sensible, like him, of course! That Atheists are the super race, that
Atheists will cure the world of its ills, that Atheists will fix everything
and grow into perfection. Of course the only qualifier to be an Atheist
in RODS eyes is to deny and despise the existence of s supreme being.
His very ideals and objects of perfection, evolutionary hype and 
Godless society making a perfect world with a perfect race with no
imperfections reminds me of something I've read in a Bible.
 
I have yet to find more than 1 Atheist who follows the Atheist doctrine
of not beleiving in a God. The rest are so busy attempting to convince
themselves and everyone who gets in their way that they start hating the
very GOD they deny exists.
 
These are the PERFECT, elect, straight-thinking super-humans as touted
by Rod Williams himself.
Whaddya know, ROd's trying to be an Atheist too.
                                                -Mike

Message: 55761
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Cliff/Majority Rule
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:15:19

Tell that to the blacks that are being repressed by the white minority in
South Africa. No majority OR minority should RULE. Everyone should work
together. I know it is terribly idealistic, but a pretty nice ideal if you
ask me.

Message: 55762
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Sloan's T(r)ash
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:39:12

If you had a life of your own, then you wouldn't hang around her attempting
to insult those whom you think don't have one. No one holds a gun to
anyone's head and forces them to subscribe to any BBS. It is the person's
decision, and it is their right to do it if they wish to do so. If you DID
have any stable lifestyle of your own, you wouldn't have to preoccupy
yourself with boosting your sagging ego by insulting those (who are probably
better off, self-wise, than you are) with childishly superficial GARBAGE. If
you DID have a life of your own, you would be living it, and leaving US
alone to live OUR lives the way WE want. And you call Skateworld a LIFE? Get
real. I have seen more childishness, superficiality, and immaturity there
than I have seen since graduating the fourth grade! But why I am wasting my
time trying to have a reasonable discussion with you. Go back to your tiny
little "life." See you in the statistics.

Message: 55763
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Rod/33rd HAW!
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:40:17

Spooky shit, Maynerd.

Message: 55764
Author: $ Apollo SYSOP
Category: $tatus users only
Subject: message 55752
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 22:56:59

The message 55752 was edited of the FOUL language.... have a Laugh!

*=* SYSOP Cliff *=*

Message: 55765
Author: $ Apollo SYSOP
Category: Answer!
Subject: Daryl...sigh
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 23:25:49

        If the majority could not get their wishes carried out... NOTHING
would get done...because there would always be someone who would not agree.
You idealistic thought...is dumb to say the least.
        This is a democratic society.  
        Democracy: n.; from 'demos' the people.  Government by the people,
majority rule.
        
        Now this country is not good enough for some, they wish to turn it
into a circus!
        One more thing... We live in the United States of America, not South
Africa... I am not talking about the Communist nations either.  I am trying
to keep the U.S.of A. from turning into counties like those others where the
Minority rule.  Some of you guys seem hell bent on taking what the people
want and putting it into the hands of some fool Judges that are easily
swayed by some damn minority.  

*=* SYSOP Cliff *=*

Message: 55766
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Ok, How Bout This
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 23:36:36

You, in effect, can claim yourself as a one-man majority in regard to this
BBS. You control everything that goes on this board, in spite of the fact
that there is a majority of users on here, as opposed to a minority of
two sysops. Yet, the minority here decides what gets done, who can say what,
and so on. You claim that my sensibilities are "dumb." However, if you were
as loyal to your "majority rule" ideology, you would not be a sysop. 

Message: 55767
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Things...
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 00:30:48

Ok, after a long talk with Cliff, we are in agreement on this point. The
Bible, the words within, that is, are what's valuable. The paper itself is
not. In such a case, I can see with this idea, that I should ease up on my
comments concerning a certain four words on our currency. That much is
settled. I thought I would post that I admit to making a mistake. Let's see
how many other people will willingly admit to making such a mistake.

Message: 55768
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: More Things...
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 00:39:15

When someone admits to making a mistake, please try and refrain from
continuing to throw their folly back into their face again and again. Even
though it might be intended (in one way or another) to be a joke, it
probably won't be percieved as such. It's hard to detect humor when it is in
sacrastic tones and in written form without any indication that it is to be
intended as such. In fact, if you don't have something nice to say, refrain
from saying it altoghether. It will keep you from getting into situations
you would rather not be in, or lose friends you don't want to lose. Not
saying that I have lost anyone's friendship (perhaps a modicum of respect,
perhaps...sorry, just the way I feel) but I have started to realize what a
fatal mistake it can be to post any real honest opinions on a BBS. It opens
up a nest of unfriendly vipers, and you end up having to defend yourself for
both things that you actually said, and things that people claim you said.
As for me, I will keep my Bible clean and neat, so that I can read it
without too much of the difficulties that might occur if there are
smudgemarks, burnmarks, or pages missing due to the calling of Mother
Nature. With that much settled, perhaps we can move past petty bickering,
and making mountains out of molehills. As a Christian, you should love your
neighbor. Judging by some of the mudslinging and mud deflecting of late
amongst many who call themselves Christians (and I hope they all are...I do
love you all), a bad example has been made by all, and to those who are not
of the faith, it has either proven to be more fuel to their fire, or perhaps
something else to deter them from learning the Word of the Lord.

As Christians, we should work together toward a better understanding, not
attempt to seperate each other through arguments over things that needn't
even be argued about. To those that believe...well, we're in the end times
folks. Now, more than ever, we need to band together, to grow together, not
tear each other apart. We need to teach each other, to understand that there
is a time to listen and a time to speak. That we must to unto others as we
expect them to do unto us. Now there are those of us who don't believe in
togetherness. That it is war that keeps us together. That there is no place
among the people of the Earth for love. I'm sorry, I can't go along with
that. I know this is a debate board, and I know that most debates are one
view vs. one view (not always, but most of the time). But I am seeing
Christians attack Christians attack Atheists attack (fill in your religion
here). Debates are meant to bring understanding. Warring only brings
seperation and unrest. I will cut this short, as Cliff has expressed to me
that he finds it long-winded and boring. Perhaps it is. But it is how I
feel. And if I cannot express my views on this board (and I think I can, or
else this message would have been deleted already) then I see no reason in
using it. Telecommunications is a tool. Use it. Don't abuse it. Knowledge
brings power. Power can corrupt, yes, but with the PROPER knowledge, the
power it yields can work wonders! If you think war is a necessary evil, then
you will probably be dismayed to find it absent from the Kingdom of Heaven.
Goodnight.
 
           >-> Daryl The Long Winded and Boring <-<

Message: 55770
Author: $ Nick Ianuzzi
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: last couple
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 02:47:26

Quit babbling.

Message: 55771
Author: $ Paul Savage
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: DAryl
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 06:16:10

I quite agree with your concepts. It is very disturbing to find Christians
squabbling among themselves, over such trivialities as denomination,
tradition and interpretation, when all we need in common is the shed blood
of our precious Lord and Saviour.
 I sometimes wonder what in heaven some of us are going to find to talk
about when we all get together on the "other side".
God bless you Daryl, as you continue your walk with Him.

Message: 55772
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Last Two
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:59:18

Rather interesting contrast between those two responses.

Nick, I'll take that as a joke.
 
Paul, thank you and God Bless.

Message: 55773
Author: $ Jim Lippard
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: 55725/Taranto
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:05:05

I think that printing "In God We Trust" on the currency is more than
"acknowledging that religion was central to the settling and founding of our
nation," I think it amounts to promotion of religion.  On the other hand, I
have no objection to the teaching of the history of religion in America in
public school, as long as it is balanced and objective.
   It had earlier appeared to me that your position was that while it is
unconstitutional for the government to promote any particular religion, it
is not unconstitutional for it to promote religious belief in general.  Now
it appears that you think both are unconstitutional, but that the motto
we've been discussing doesn't constitute either.

Message: 55774
Author: $ Jim Lippard
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Sandy
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:07:04

I'm working on a Ph.D. in philosophy (phi. of mind) with a minor in
cognitive science.  That minor may end up being another degree.

Message: 55775
Author: $ Jim Lippard
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Mike
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:11:24

Unfortunately, it's not true that Ph.D.'s don't impress anyone.  (I say
unfortunately, because I agree that most of them are fairly meaningless--a
Ph.D. is no guarantee that a person has any idea what he's talking about.) 
I'm working on mine out of my own personal interest in the subject.  By the
way, I've had real jobs for 7 years and paid far more in taxes than I've
taken out in loans (which I fully intend to pay off).
   Thanks for your Christian concern.

Message: 55776
Author: $ Jim Lippard
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Carter
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:15:28

I'm having a bit of trouble getting anything coherent out of your message,
but I should point out that atheism does not imply hedonism, or humanism, or
anything else.  That's part of the reason I am opposed to Madalyn Murray
O'Hair's American Atheists organization.  I don't think atheism constitutes
a common ground sufficient for forming an organization any more than not
being a fisherman does.

Message: 55777
Author: $ Jim Lippard
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Thornburg
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:28:20

Good point regarding the statistics.  It shows that we should compare the
percentage of Christian child molestors and violent crime committors with
the percentage of Christians in the population at large.  In the mashed
potato case, it's clear that the percentage in the general population is
almost exactly the same, which makes any alleged causal relationship between
crime and potatoes highly questionable (to say the least).  If, on the other
hand, we found that a significantly smaller percentage of the general
population ate mashed potatoes, we might have something.
   So, if significantly less than 90% of the general population is Christian
(which I believe is the case), then there must be some other explanation to
the fact (assuming it is a fact) that 90% of child molestors are Christians.
 One possible explanation is that people in prison simply claim to be
Christian in order to get leniency, an early parole, or whatever.  This
definitely is something that happens.  On the other hand, there really is
strong evidence that a large proportion of child molestors are clergymen.
(For example, Annie Laurie Gaylor's book _Betrayal of Truth_ documents
several hundred publicized cases over the last few years.)

Message: 55778
Author: $ Jim Lippard
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: 55757/Thornburg
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:38:39

Unfortunately, the Christians who "know" otherwise tend to be completely
unfamiliar with any of the opposing evidence--they've never heard of G.A.
Wells, of Bornkamm, Kaesemann, Dibelius, Bultmann, Richard Friedman, Elaine
Pagels, David Strauss.  And unfamiliarity with easily available contrary
evidence undermines any claim to knowledge (which is, at the very least,
justified true belief).

Message: 55779
Author: $ Jim Lippard
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: 55767-69/Daryl
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 10:47:22

I'm sorry that you are coming to the conclusion that it is a "fatal mistake"
to post honest opinions on a BBS.  I for one have found your contributions
valuable (though I frequently disagree with them) and hope that you would
continue making serious contributions rather than resort to superficial
contributions (such as the repetitive and tiresome sarcastic attacks that
some users insist upon making).

Message: 55780
Author: $ Todd Reese
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Burkhart
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 12:51:19

Imagine for a moment, if you will...  if minority ruled.  Imagine all the
differences there would be if government/etc were based on minority rule
instead of majority rule.
 
An interesting thought...

Message: 55781
Author: $ Apollo SYSOP
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: OLD TIME TEST
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 13:08:37

Ahhh, this is fun!  I am logged on Apollo from Wood 
Brothers & Halstead Lumber's TRS-80 Mod 4 with a 300
Baud accustic modem.... using Omniterm.  Seems only
a few years ago, this was a hot setup....  
Anyway... this test has passed.

The old days were slower than I rememberd!

Give me my 2400 BAUD anyday!

Omniterm must do something funny with CTRL A, I will
have to say *=* SYSOP Cliff *=* manualy...Grrrrr

Message: 55782
Author: $ Chris Neal
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Slone
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 17:11:22

We, The people of this BBS refuse to have an intectually stimulating
arguement with someone who is completely unarmed...
Now to the basics, before we get a life, you need to get a job, to show you
the value of a dollar! Geek!
 
----------=============*******>CHRIS<*******=============------114/18.8

Message: 55783
Author: $ Apro Poet
Category: Politics
Subject: Chomsky
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 17:52:30

  We might note that the dual Latin American reaction to
Toriello's words has been duplicated more than once.  UN
correspondent Louis Wiznitzer, commenting on how "United 
States standing in Latin America has reached an all-time low"
because of US actions against Nicaragua, observes that "one
sign of Latin American feelings toward the US was the cool 
reception Vice-President George Bush and Secretary of State
George Shultz received" when they appeared at the 
inauguration of the new Brazilian president.  They "are not
personally unpopular in Latin America," he notes, "Yet at 
this reception they were booed, while Nicaragua's President
Daniel Ortega was applauded," a fact generally unreported 
here.  Two months earlier, ABC reported that on a visit to
Uruguay, Ortega was "greeted by wildly enthusiastic crowds,
cheering his name as if he was about to be named president of
Uruguay," a fact again generally ignored in the media.  But
few Latin Americans will risk offending the hemisphere's Big
Brother when the chips are down.
  Returning to Guatemala, the relevant point is that whatever
the facts, Guatemala had to be an agency of the Communist
conspiracy so as to justify the U.S. overthrow of its
democratic government, motivated on quite different grounds.
  This characteristic device of US foreign policy is now 
being employed in the familiar manner in Nicaragua, where the

Reagan Administration is attempting to drive the Sandinista
regime securely into the hands of the Evil Empire just as it
is acting to undermine the private sector through embargo, so
as to create the "totalitarian" state that is required to 
justify US violence, to the distress of business groups and 
the conservative Nicaraguan Church hierarchy that we purport
to favor.
  Harvard Business School professor James Austin describes 
the embargo as "a flagrant violation of international 
agreements," and also "an affront to the basic values of our
society" and a "foreign policy blunder" that is 
"counterproductive" because it drives Nicaragua towards 
dependence on the Soviet Union.  The first point is correct;
the second reflects a serious misunderstanding both of the
basic values of our society as they are expressed in
historical practice, and of the goals of the policy.  Austin
observes that the boycott violates the GATT agreements on
trade as well as treaties between Nicaragua and the US; it
expresses the position "that other countries should adhere to
the agreements, laws and treaties, but the United States need
not."  True, but quite consistent with our historical 
practice.  He quotes an "outraged and bewildered marketing
manager ((who)) exclaimed: "This is the most absurd thing
the United States has done, because it is mostly hurting the
private sector'," and he observes that it has even been
criticized by the US-financed rightist press *La Prensa*.
Austin comments accurately that the effect will be similar to
the Cuban boycott, which increased Cuban dependency on the
USSR, concluding that "the president has failed to learn 
from history."  But US planners understand all of this well
enough, and are following a rational course (in their terms)
with ample historical precedent, fully expecting the 
consequences that Austin deplores, and recognizing that these
consequences will be readily exploited to justify the attack
against Nicaragua in defense of the Fifth Freedom.  There is
nothing "absurd" about this, though it does "stand with the
moral repulsiveness of providing aid to the *contras*," as
Austin states.  He particularly deplores the fact that the
embargo will undermine the US-made potable water system and
Nicaraguan hospitals, which rely on US equipment; all 
"inhumane" and "morally reprehensible," but fully in accord
with our operative values, throughout our history.

Message: 55786
Author: $ Bob Thornburg
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Lippard
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 19:46:00

Basically, what you are implying, is that most child molestors are
Christians.  I can't buy it.  If your statistics are correct, they must be
based on false information.  I do notice that most unbelievers cast
Christians in an unfavorable light.  For example, in the movies, 90% (my
statistic) of Christians are portrayed as crazy, evil, greedy, etc.  Now I
will be the first to admit that Christians are not perfect.  I don't know of
any who profess to be perfect.  But Hollywood sure misses the mark by a long
shot.  And I think your statistics miss also.
But I think the real point of your implication is to support your own point
of view.  And that is, God does not exist, and anyone who thinks he does is
quite mixed up in the head.  I think you're wrong.

Message: 55787
Author: $ James Taranto
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Lippard/55779
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 19:59:58

What a geek.

Message: 55788
Author: $ James Taranto
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Lippard
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:03:23

The Constitution does not say anything about "promoting" religious belief;
it prohibits the establishment of religion by the state.  The latter is a
much narrower concept than the former.  Suppose, for example, that the
government sets up a drug-rehabilitation program, and employed clergymen
among counselors.  This might "promote" religious belief, but it would not
amount to unconstitutional establishment of religion.

A school voucher system, in which the government would fund the education of
students who attend parochial schools, would also tend to "promote"
religion, but it would not constitute establishment.

Message: 55790
Author: $ James Taranto
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Westfall
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:05:08

Well excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me!

Message: 55791
Author: $ Rod Williams
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Mike
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 20:54:48

        Your messages have that cute ring to them.

Message: 55792
Author: $ Rod Williams
Category: Chit Chat
Subject: Today
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 21:04:26

        What a wonderful day.  Sure beats last Friday.
                        Rod
P.S.  There are some good messages here today.

WAY Below Normal Bulletin Board command:$C

Message: 520
Author: $ Mike Carter
Category: Hawley Crock Smith
Subject: Creative
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:51:30

When you lose 60 lbs of that stink-encrusted blubber mass that hangs
like used rubbers around your belly-button, and when you can add
without aid of calculator or fingers, then perhaps you can move fast
enough, agile enough, to catch the train of life that has long since
passed your stupid soap-box.

Message: 521
Author: $ Mike Carter
Category: Christian Rod!
Subject: Boxes
Date: 11/27/88  Time: 21:54:01

Yep!
We have Baked beans, lima beans, chili beans, bean-burrito's,
kidney beans, green beans, mexican jumping beans, jim beam's and
a wide variety of gasseous emulsifiers ready in cans.
All you need to furnish is the CHURCH KEY, asshole!

Message: 522
Author: $ James Hawley
Category: Mike Farter
Subject: Last
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 03:08:46

Your last couple of posts only reinforce my message.  You can NEVER come up
with a good solution or answer to a problem.  You can only spout off your
incessant Aussie slurs.  

Sometimes I think the Romans had a real good idea when they fed Christians
to the lions.

Message: 523
Author: $ Ann Oudin
Category: Mike Farter
Subject: Mike/last
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:39:57

Now that was a great Christian post to James if I ever saw one! Where did
you learn to be so insulting? In Bible class? 

Message: 524
Author: $ Ann Oudin
Category: Annie the ASSp
Subject: James/lions
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 08:41:29

Hahahahahahahahahahaha - Mike owes you a 'touche'! -=*) ANN (*=-

Message: 525
Author: $ Daryl Westfall
Category: Christian Rod!
Subject: Yeah, Mike
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 09:07:11

You have to admit, that was pretty insensitive and tasteless, even for a
master insulter such as yourself. However, I for one did not enjoy it. And
you know how much I like to exchange insults with you!

Message: 526
Author: $ Rod Williams
Category: Silly Burkhart
Subject: last five
Date: 11/28/88  Time: 21:08:49

        Is something happening right now in your life that we should know
about?  Are you in need of any help?  I am available.
                                Rod
        (This message is for Mike Carter, sorry)