Mail from Apollo SYSOP Date: 05/17/90 Time: 00:14:05 Rod I was hoping you would have taken care of that post that I said was in poor taste for MY PUBlic board. Anything on SEX must be posted in the COSmos SIG. Dean Hathaway does not run this board, so him saying it was okay does not give you the right to post garbage. I have tried hard to get along with you...but I can't. I would rather you ONLY post in the COSmos SIG since you don't seem to know what is in poor taste or not. My boys like to read the PUBlic board, but I have to ban them off when you post garbage. This is not a new rule... I am not trying to hard ass you, I just want the PUBlic board sqeeky clean... Read the last paragraph in the cmd in theain menu. It said " I as Sysop have the right to delete any post I feel that is not in good taste" Dean's name is not in there any place. I gave you chance to fix it... you failed so I zapped it! *=* the 'Mighty' Apollo SYSOP *=* $tatus Club Bulletin Board command:$C Message: 6502 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit-Chat Subject: Melissa/Pastor Date: 05/17/90 Time: 07:29:18 Well, the first and foremost reason to attend church (IMHO) is to worship God and to hear His Word. Every Pastor may have his own individual style of delivering God's Word, but the most important thing is that he is doing so. If this particular Pastor is to change churches, I do not necessarily see any problem with transferring to that church if you feel best instructed by him. However, if a Pastor leaves the ministry altogether, or moves out of town or out of state, this should not cause the person to stop attending church altogether. We must not let the minister outshine the ministry. We are at church to worship God and be instructed by Scripture, but not to be entertained. Now, I am not against a Pastor who can hold your attention, not at all. In fact, I am currently attending two churches because they both teach God's Word so well and deal with Scriptural answers to today's problems as well as teaching the historical accounts of the Bible. But I am not to say "Is Pastor Xxxxx going to be speaking tonight? If not, I don't want to go," or "Is there going to be a soloist or is the choir going to sing? If not, I'd rather stay home and watch TV." I know I seem to be running far afield, but I felt I needed to to state exactly what I meant. A Pastor may make a particular service interesting, but it is God's Word alone that we should concern ourselves with during that service. Worship service is God coming to us, not just us going to God. Message: 6503 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit-Chat Subject: Ann/Honest Date: 05/17/90 Time: 07:31:03 I understand and thank you for being honest. I hope you do not get upset when I ask you...since you were all for attending church while he was there and did not "need or want" it after he left, would you say that he was the main reason why you went to church? I'm not trying to set you up for anything, so don't worry. Just trying to understand. Message: 6504 Author: $ Gary Jones Category: Chit-Chat Subject: IMHO Date: 05/17/90 Time: 12:49:20 Oh Lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way! (IMHO) Message: 6505 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Chit-Chat Subject: gary/IMHO Date: 05/17/90 Time: 13:21:03 Oh rats ! Now who sang that song ? It was one of my favorites. Message: 6506 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit-Chat Subject: Gary/6504 Date: 05/18/90 Time: 00:04:42 Heh heh. Message: 6507 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit-Chat Subject: Roger/6505 Date: 05/18/90 Time: 00:04:56 It was Mac Davis, wasn't it? Message: 6508 Author: $ James Hawley Category: Answer! Subject: Last Date: 05/18/90 Time: 00:50:18 Yep. Public & Free Bulletin Board command:$C Message: 65715 Author: $ Beauregard Dog Category: Chit Chat Subject: Cliff on MLK Date: 05/16/90 Time: 23:21:36 I think I've heard that Honest Abe played around... and we have a day to honor him. Memorial Day and Veterans Day both honor *war*, and Independence day honors *revolution*. Why not an MLK day? You are going to circulate petitions? Good luck getting enough signatures during the summer. Message: 65716 Author: $ Beauregard Dog Category: Chit Chat Subject: Right to Vote Date: 05/16/90 Time: 23:25:49 Well, Cliff, two groups got together to fix the error that the legislature made last year when they swapped MLK day for Columbus day. They've just fixed that by restoring Columbus day. Pat Quaranta (sp?) of the Italian-American club is going to suggest to his followers that things are now they way that they should be, and that they shouldn't sign or circulate new petitions. By the way, he and his group supplied over half of the signatures last time around. This is the way the system is supposed to work. People complain about a law, and the legislature can try to fix it. All the people can do is simply repeal things. Too bad that Jan Brewer voted against the law (and I'll bet our Reps did today, too (though I'm not as certain about them)) -- I would have liked to have seen an anti-Brewer campaign this fall. Message: 65717 Author: $ Apollo SYSOP Category: Chit Chat Subject: Dog on Memorial Day Date: 05/16/90 Time: 23:58:23 It does not honor *WAR*... it honors men who died fighting for their country. As for MLK, it is a bone thrown to the black people by politicians. Arizona needed it to insure we would get the SuperBowl game. Political Blackmail.... and I resent it. The whole thing is so phony! Yes, the Legislature is suppose to work for the people, but when there is as much opposition and flack about an issue, it is suppose to go to the PEOPLE so they can VOTE on it. There was one legislature that had been told by her constituents they did not want the holiday, but she said " I think the MLK is right, so I am not going to listen to what my district wants" and she voted for it to pass.... What kind of representatives do we have when they do NOT listen? I for one am going to vote out anyone who voted for taking the vote away from the people. Lincoln was not a Communist sympathizer by the way. *=* the 'Mighty' Apollo SYSOP *=* Message: 65718 Author: $ Apollo SYSOP Category: The SYSOP Speaks Subject: ZAPPING Date: 05/17/90 Time: 00:26:33 I apped Rod's post (# 65679) as I felt it was in poor taste. Read the cmd in the ain menu. I want the PUBlic board to be sqeeky clean. There is the COSmos SIG where I let you talk about ANYTHING you want to as long as it is legal. (No credit card numbers...etc) I really do NOT wish to have to kick any user off, but I will be damned if they will force their moral standards on me as standards for this lic board. And I don't care if another users tells you it is OKAY, this board is run by me.... not them. Rod... you have been warned more then ANY other user on Apollo. *=* the 'Mighty' Apollo SYSOP *=* Yes, I asked Rod to fix his post first... Message: 65719 Author: $ Mike Carter Category: Chit Chat Subject: MLK Date: 05/17/90 Time: 01:06:53 The way I look at this mish mash is quite simple; There are two groups..one group says if you're not FOR a paid MLK day your reasons must be racially founded. The other group says that you gotta be communist to allow legislators to take a vote away from you. I'd rather be called something I'm not than not do something I am. Off to the petitions for me. If these self serving media basking tax - fattened hyena's think for one moment I'm gonna lie down, shorts down, ready fore them to use a grease-less shaft on me on this topic... Mikes second law of politics; $hit flows uphill. Message: 65720 Author: $ James Hawley Category: Answer! Subject: Cliff/Zapping. Date: 05/17/90 Time: 03:01:45 The rules also say, no profanity. Naughty, naughty. Message: 65721 Author: $ James Hawley Category: Question? Subject: Rod's post? Date: 05/17/90 Time: 03:02:14 Why not move it to the COS sig so we can take a look at it? Message: 65722 Author: $ Paul Savage Category: Religion Subject: Roger Date: 05/17/90 Time: 05:50:31 The only thing closed, my friend, is your mind, to truth. You are so busy trying to debunk, disprove, analyze, criticize and otherwise find fault with God's Love Letter to His creation that you have totally missed the simplicity of the message, which is summed up in the simple statement that God loves you so much that He sent His Son, Jesus to the cross to die so that you and I and whosoever believes can be found worthy through Christ to dwell for eternity in the kingdom that God has prepared for us. It's the only reason I need to believe that the Bible is the Word of God. NOW the case is closed. Message: 65723 Author: $ Paul Savage Category: Religion Subject: Roger's humanism Date: 05/17/90 Time: 05:53:35 Humanism IS a celf-centered belief, Roger. By that, I don't mean necessarily Roger centered (in yor case). Rather a humanistic belief puts man (generic) in the driver's seat, at the center of the picture, in control, and gives God a back seat, if it recognizes Him at all. It has been called the most dangerous religion of the 20th century. I can believe it. Message: 65724 Author: $ Paul Savage Category: Religion Subject: Roger again Date: 05/17/90 Time: 05:55:26 Since the devil himself, the father of lies, can disguise himself as an angel of truth, you had better be careful where you pick up all that "truth" "no matter where you find it". Could be a booby trap. Message: 65725 Author: $ Paul Savage Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/65702 Date: 05/17/90 Time: 05:56:52 That drivel is not worth a response, so I won't. Message: 65726 Author: $ Paul Savage Category: Religion Subject: Reed Sea/ M.M. Date: 05/17/90 Time: 06:02:11 And just which "critique" did that story come from. My Bible still says Red Sea, and still has the pharaoh's soldiers and their horses drowning when the sea closed upon them, not when the tide rose. It also has the Israelites crossing dry shod, quite a feat even at low tide. Back to yor fairy tales. Message: 65727 Author: $ Paul Savage Category: Chit Chat Subject: Mike Niddleton Date: 05/17/90 Time: 06:06:12 "Those same people don't have a clue what the Bible really says or means or how to live lives dedicated to the teachings it contains." And I suppose that you have graciously come along to lead us all into the light as our great example, huh? I can hardly wait. (But I won't hold my breath, since I would not want to hold your recent posts up as a shining example of a great Christian attitude.) Message: 65728 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/65649 Date: 05/17/90 Time: 07:43:29 If the Word of God doesn't convince you, my friend, nothing will. (Romans 10:17) Message: 65729 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Cliff Date: 05/17/90 Time: 07:45:55 If I had to make a choice between "Christians-only" voting and having the ote module suspended, I'd choose the latter. But seriously, though. Why don't we just put the ote on the back burner for a while, until everyone's dander is down, and then re-start from there? Message: 65730 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/65658 Date: 05/17/90 Time: 07:51:09 Speaking for myself Roger, yes, I have. But it is the one who died on it, not the cross itself, that leads to salvation. The cross is simply a reminder of our Savior's great love for us. Message: 65731 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Dean Date: 05/17/90 Time: 08:03:39 By becoming a Christian a person does not volunteer "to be judged by biblical standards." The Law is there to show us our sins, and the Gospel is there to show us our Savior. When we comply with God's Law it is not because it compliance will assure our salvatioon or non-compliance will assure our damnation. "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith - and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no one can boast. (Eph 2:8)" We as Christians follow God's commands because we WANT to, out of loving obedience to Him, not because we HAVE to, out of fear of a merciless judge. Now, if we REJECT him, that's another matter. The only sin that remains to be judged is the sin of unbelief. All others were nailed to the cross. Whether you believe Him or not, whether you love Him or not, whether you even care or not, he still atoned for your sins. Like I said, all I'm doing is presenting the other side, presenting God's viewpoint. Because you are do not believe in God, you are going to do what you are going to do regardless. This will not make me hate you. It will make me hate your sin, but you I cannot hate. You have heard God's word and rejected it. I cannot change that. You still have the rest of your life; things could change, you might come to know God in that time. I hope you do. But understand that me calling sin a sin is not going to cause you not to do it if you have your mind set on it. Only God can change one's heart from a rebellious nature. I hope you do not think I am barking at you to stop doing what you are doing, for without God there is no desire to change. I'd like to see you change, but again, I believe only God can do that. Thanks. Message: 65732 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Religion Subject: rod/debate Date: 05/17/90 Time: 08:56:17 I had some early "debates" with James White on another board that was interesting. I got accused of being a "secular humanist". I didn't know that it was a compliment until I read the "Humanist", the magazine of Humanism, and found that the basic principles of humanism was love and care for your fellow man, respect him, be tolerant,... Message: 65733 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Religion Subject: Paul/closed Date: 05/17/90 Time: 09:00:00 You and I agree. I believe the Bible points to the way for our reunion with God. My quarrel is with those who believe the Bible is the inerrant Word of God and try to make that a precondition for salvation. Message: 65734 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Religion Subject: Humanism Date: 05/17/90 Time: 09:01:32 Why is humanism dangerous ? Is is dangerous to respect your fellow man ? To tolerate different belief systems ? To love one another ? Seems the only danger is from intolerant dogmatic religious zealots who believe they speak for God. Message: 65735 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Religion Subject: Paul/devil Date: 05/17/90 Time: 09:02:24 I ask again: show me some "proof" that the Holy Spirit has given you faith to believe the impossible. Message: 65736 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Chit Chat Subject: Paul/65725 Date: 05/17/90 Time: 09:08:30 What you mean is that you can't. That "drivel" goes to the heart of your belief and my belief. I have to ask myself the question "Is my belief in God a delusion?" Answering such questions with answers such as "the Holy Spirit guides me" is not sufficient, for I could be deluded into believing that by my own mind or, to use your example, powers that are evil. What better trick to play by the devil than to delude the majority of believers with false doctrines as biblical infallibility. Think of the stumbling-blocks put before educated and intelligent folks like Rod, Beau and others with such a belief. Another piece of evidence that doctrine may be a delusion or inspired by the devil is the reaction I get when I question this particular belief in your case and an Daryl's and Mike's. I suggest you read the heated and defensive messages that you all have written. They are not good examples of Christian responses. So, all I do is ask you to consider what I have said, and ask the question "Is this belief man-made, a delusion, or even inspired by the devil?" Message: 65737 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Chit Chat Subject: Daryl/WoG Date: 05/17/90 Time: 09:11:00 First, you have to find the Word of God. If you think that by inserting a phrase that "all scripture is God-breathed" makes it the Word of God, I've got some more books for you to consider as well (The Book of Mormon, The Koran). No, you need evidence to back up the claim. Where is it ? Otherwise, it is a man-made doctrine or, worse, devil-inspired. Message: 65738 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Religion Subject: daryl/65730 Date: 05/17/90 Time: 09:16:17 Ah, that might explain your attitude. Why did Paul use the term "Cross" when he spoke of foolishness. The cross represents something to us also. We have to follow Jesus to the Cross to become reunited with God. What does that mean ? It means we are dead, dead, dead. When you are dead it does not matter who spits on you, makes fun of you, who says nasty things about you. For once you are dead, God resurrects you as a part of Christ's body. When we are dead we don't have egos do we ? It doesn't mean we don't ask questions, probe, challenge, or give up our love of science. It just means that it doesn't matter to US. So the cross is more than a reminder of Jesus love for us, it is the central object of your and my faith. Message: 65739 Author: $ Bill Burkett Category: War! Subject: Cliff: Mike's Last Date: 05/17/90 Time: 09:31:08 I wish to complain publicly about Mike Carter's last post (Message 65719). My 11-year-old son is beginning to show an interest in issues and such, and it wouldn't surprise me if he starts logging into Apollo just like his old man. I do not wish him to read graphic allusions of homosexual acts at this point in his development. Mike's transgression is all the more grievous because it follows by a very short time Cliff's admonition to us all regarding his desires for the ublic message area. I also find it very interesting that one of Apollo's most vociferous christians would find it in his heart to post such a message. Cliff, I ask that message 65719 be
apped and that Mike be publicly reminded of his obligation to abide by Apollo's rules. Message: 65740 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Chit Chat Subject: cliff/rod/zap Date: 05/17/90 Time: 13:19:58 I would also like to ask to see Rod's offensive post. Would you mind putting it in the Cosmos SIG ? Thanks. Message: 65741 Author: Mike Middleton Category: Religion Subject: PseudoChristianity Date: 05/17/90 Time: 15:56:34 What is selfish about humanism? Here's selfish: Since *I* asked God into *MY* heart and *I* claim the Bible is what it clearly isn't, and since *I* went through the right ritual of Baptism in the right way and time of *MY* life, and since *I* and so holy and *SELF* righteous NOW "GOD OWES ME ETERNAL LIFE, A PARTY AT HIS EXPENSE, IN HEAVEN WITH HIM WHEN I DIE." That is PseudoChrisitianity and based on the carnal human selfish desire to live forever and be more right than others. Your "religion" is far more selfish than humanism, and it is not at all what Jesus taught. Give me an unselfish humanist who sees the hope and the good in people over a Fundamentalist bigot every day. . _|_ . | . | Mike Message: 65742 Author: Mike Middleton Category: Religion Subject: Drivel Date: 05/17/90 Time: 16:05:42 I guess you caught me driveling on myself again. Thanks for the view from the other side. Certainly there is no Satan or Devil I can blame for getting my ego all defensive. The question, I take it, is "Is faith man-made?" Well, faith in what? What is faith. I know what happened to me. I died. Yet I live. THe doctrines that try to explain that are certainly man-made. Our limited view of God is certainly man-made. For sure, our hateful posts are man-made. Conclusion? 99.9% of "religion" is man-made and drivel. But there IS something beyond that. A door that opens to the real purpose of life. WE slam it shut when we peek through and see that it is death, in our lack of trust in that which we can not conceive of. Good question, Roger. And you are not closed-minded and I like your humanism and I have grown in faith due to your questioning and probing mind. Glad to be able to respond here. Please (everyone) realize that I do not begrudge Cliff his nickles and dimes if he needs them, I just don't believe in charging for a BBS and I won't be sending any money here, so just be aware that my posts will be restricted in number and location. If anyone wishes me to get a post, it must be in the public area. I may need a few days to respond to other posts. That is all. . ))( . {-.-} . >v< Mike Message: 65743 Author: $ Bob Thornburg Category: Chit Chat Subject: Dean Date: 05/17/90 Time: 16:19:04 Re: "that is like saying that there wouldn't be any racial problems if{blacks were all enslaved or sent back to Africa." It's different. The difference is, one is based on love and the other is based on hate. Re: "Enforcing biblical law upon everyone, rather than the natural law (which includes the rational parts of biblical law anyway) is repugnant to all but the Christian (or it should be if it they aren't too apathetic to care)." The Old Testament law was only given to the Jews. It is not binding to any Gentile (that's you and me dude). You cannot force any law on anyone. Did you ever notice how many people obey the 55 MPH limit? Regardless, if only the people part of the 10 commands (the ones based on loving your neighbor) were followed, there would be no AIDS, wars, etc. I am not too apathetic to care. I know you are not too apathetic to care. Is there anyone on Apollo who is too apathetic to care? Message: 65744 Author: $ Bob Thornburg Category: Chit Chat Subject: Dog Date: 05/17/90 Time: 16:25:30 Re: "Memorial Day and Veterans Day both honor *war*, and Independence day honors *revolution*. Why not an MLK day?" I don't think we should have any more paid holidays period. Only the people who work for the government get all the holidays off with pay. And even now the Government is crying it doesn't have enough money. They keep wanting to raise taxes. And each new holiday costs millions. What secular business gives all holidays off with pay? Message: 65745 Author: $ Bob Thornburg Category: Chit Chat Subject: Mike Date: 05/17/90 Time: 16:28:37 Re: "I'd rather be called something I'm not than not do something I am." That sounds like something a politician would say. :-) (-: :-) (-: :-) :-) (-: :-) (-: :-) (-: :-) (-: Message: 65746 Author: $ Bob Thornburg Category: Chit Chat Subject: Rqoger Date: 05/17/90 Time: 16:34:28 Re: "I didn't know that it was a compliment until I read the "Humanist"" Calling someone a "secular humanist" is not intended as an insult no more than calling someone a Christian. It is a statement of fact. I'm a Christian. Are you a Secular Humanist? Maybe you are a Secular Humorist? :-) (-: :-) (-: :-) :-) (-: :-) (-: :-) (-: :-) (-: Message: 65747 Author: $ Bob Thornburg Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger Date: 05/17/90 Time: 16:36:45 Re: "My quarrel is with those who believe the Bible is the inerrant Word of God and try to make that a precondition for salvation." I don't know any Christian who believes that. Maybe some do, but I don't know any. I don't know any who think it is a precondition to salvation. Message: 65748 Author: $ Bob Thornburg Category: Chit Chat Subject: Mike M Date: 05/17/90 Time: 16:41:08 Re: "Since *I* asked God into *MY* heart and *I* claim the Bible is what it clearly isn't, and since *I* went through the right ritual of Baptism in the right way and time of *MY* life, and since *I* and so holy and *SELF* righteous NOW "GOD OWES ME ETERNAL LIFE, A PARTY AT HIS EXPENSE, IN HEAVEN WITH HIM WHEN I DIE."" I don't know any Christian who believes all that. Surely you don't. Message: 65749 Author: $ Mike Carter Category: War! Subject: Burkett Date: 05/17/90 Time: 20:00:15 Get you mind out of the gutter, kiddo. "Shorts down, ready fore them to use a grease-less shaft on me on this.." Somewhere I miss the homosexual connotations and if this is too graphic for your poor sheltered lil boy, then you might be better keeping him sheltered. This country has some rights that allow such "GRAPHIC" language to be used. What is more profane than what you suggest I wrote is your intention to take away my 1st ammendment rights and or censure my opinions. Go hide in Russia, pinheads like you don't deserve 1st ammendments. Message: 65750 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Chit Chat Subject: Rqoger Date: 05/17/90 Time: 20:57:30 No, I am not a "secular" humanist, although with the posts I have been reading from the Christian side I may yet become one. I am a humanist. I agree with most of the principles of humanism. If I was an atheist, I would be a secular humanist, but since I am an agnostic Christian, I guess I'm a Christian humanist, as was Jesus Christ. Message: 65751 Author: $ Roger Mann Category: Chit Chat Subject: bob/precondition Date: 05/17/90 Time: 20:59:27 If you don't you sure don't like anyone who doesn't believe that it is. Do you think I am a Christian ? Do you think it is possible to become a Christian if you don't think the Bible is the Word of God ? Message: 65752 Author: Jeff Lochansky Category: Drug Talk Subject: re. Peter Petrisco Date: 05/17/90 Time: 22:40:49 As for your question, I was not opposed to the vietnam war. As a matter of fakt I think we could have won it, if it wasn't for civilians trying to run the military. I know lots of vietnam vets, most of them agree with me. I did not say all of them now!!!!! Back to drugs. The way you can show a young person how to better himself with an education is, to give him positive examples an dfeedback. Show him that with the proper schooling he can make good money and not be scared every time he leaves his house. Dont tell me that isn't posible, because there are to many examples of succesful people out there. Show that young person what drugs really do to people, all the pain they cause. such as all the deformed baibies, the person that died of an overdose, the inocent people killed, and last but not least show him the grief of a slain policemans famiely. There is to much pain and heart ache involved in this we have to try!!!!! and do something about it. Trowing a drug abuser in jail with hardcore criminals isn't going to help that person eather, in this element he or she will just go down deeper. I am not a devoted cristian, but I believe that you have to believe in a higher power to pull through an ordeal like that. This fack is well documented with Narcotics Anonoumus. Their success rate is way ut there. I will not quote numbers since I dont know them. N.A. stresses the fact that you have to believe in a higher power to stay clean. I is not easy, but nobody told you it would be. As you can see there are a number of option open to a drug user to get help, That person just has to want. The same goes for a gang member, who most of the time is addicted also. If that G.A. wants to get out he can. Tere are no 2 ways about it.=============MAD MAX============== Message: 65753 Author: Jeff Lochansky Category: Drug Talk Subject: re: Dean Hathaway Date: 05/17/90 Time: 22:59:21 I think most of what you sayed is total BOLOGNE and you can bank on it. What do you mean by minority. Drug users and dealers are by fare not the minority were I am concerned. Have you ever cosidered the waste of it all? The rights of an individual are just fine, but what about thehousends of children born deformed or dead or worse every year. do they have a choice, can they Vote, Can they tell mommy not to take drugs? Explain that to me, even butter jet, give me a solution if you think you have it. I dont think so. Would you like to know what just 1 gram of crystal or coke will do to a child? Well wether or not you want to I'll tell you anyways, because I know from expierience. My Ex wifes son was born with a hernia, a hole in his stomach, water on the brain, elevated white bloodcount( possible lucemia) and he is allergic to just about anything. The reason I call him her son by the way is because he is not mine. Do you want to know wy? Because I didnt give her any money for dope she sleept with her dealer to get it and atayed with him to get more.By the way again, she is preagnant by him again and still!!!!! doing drugs. That boy might not be mine, but for 1 year i thought he was, the pain to me was unbelievable. Can you really justify the agony children like that have to go through and there are thousends of those children out there. You might say my attude is selfish, you are darn right it is. but I think I can be selfish, just this once. If a human being wants to destroy itself I think it should be able to, but not at the expense of others. I will get over my pain sometime but my almost son never will, what about his brother or sister that is on the way. What will we do with tose ch If you have any answers please let me know, because I really dont always know. That was only my opinion on the children, drugs are destroing millions of lives of inocent people, that dont have a choice, like, and I7ll put my catigory on the top, because I7m selfish: husbands,wifes,brothers,sisters,mothers,fathers,etc. tose are just to name a few. you say I could have left? how could I, I loved and still love that person to much. If she were to come back I still couldn't say no. Does that qualify me to be human& loving? I hope so. If you are married, could you leave your wife? I would shure like to know. Well I've got to go, sorry I hogged the board so long ==============MAD MAX=============== Message: 65755 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/Atheist Date: 05/17/90 Time: 23:14:33 I'm sorry if I classed you an atheist. It was sheer clumsiness on my part, and I do apologize. Is agnostic okay? (I'm asking this question seriously.) Message: 65756 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/65735 Date: 05/17/90 Time: 23:16:47 The "proof," even if Paul could present it to you in a way that would convince at least one of the five sensory conductors with which you input information for your brain to reason, you still would not believe. Message: 65757 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/Responses Date: 05/17/90 Time: 23:27:08 What would you consider to be a good Christian response? A "la-de-da," nicey nicey candyfloss attitude? Sorry, but it doesn't always work that way. We are spiritually reborn, but we still have our "old Adam" to contend with. We still get angry, we still get exasperated, and yes, we still tend to fly off the handle at times. That makes us no less Christians, for salvation is not dependent upon works. Christianity is not just some phony "everything is always okay" lifestyle. Charles Swindoll said it well (and this is a rare quote from him that I will AGREE with!): Surrounded by numerous types to whom everybody is "fantastic," "super," and "incredible," let's work hard at being real. This means we are free to question, to admit failure or weakness, to confess wrong, to declare the truth. When a person is authentic, he or she does not have to win or always be in the top ten or make a big impression or look super-duper pious. Message: 65758 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/Mormon Date: 05/17/90 Time: 23:36:19 I think that the origin of the Book of Mormon is clear to those that know the history of Joseph Smith, the "Book of Abraham" and the Sensen papyrus, and the Kindernook plates, among other things. In addition to the fact that not ONE piece of physical evidence has been found to verify the existence of any of the peoples spoken of in the B of M. There has been plenty of evidence found to prove that the peoples of the Old Testament and New Testament times at least LIVED where Scripture says they lived. Scripture tells us that we should not run willy-nilly to whoever is shouting "Here's Christ," or "There's Christ," or even "Hey, I'M Christ!" (Yes, I have seen someone in the New Times who claimed to be a trance-channeler for Jesus, as if Jesus would need a spirit-medium to make himself known!) When he returns, EVERYONE will know. Until then, we should turn to the Words written under inspiration of the Holy Spirit by those that knew Him best. I had some information on the Qu'ran here somewhere, let me find it and I'll get back to you. Message: 65759 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: Roger/Cross Date: 05/17/90 Time: 23:41:06 Christ is the center of my faith. The cross is a reminder of His love and sacrifice, but apart from that, it's just a couple of beams of wood, nothing more. Message: 65760 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: Chit Chat Subject: 65739/Bill Date: 05/17/90 Time: 23:42:53 I would agree. There are far more eloquent ways to express opinions on the matter. Message: 65761 Author: $ Daryl Westfall Category: My Dinner with... Subject: Mike/65741 Date: 05/17/90 Time: 23:47:06 (Mike, are all the Christians on this BBS like you, full of viterol[sic] and venom? is that your witness of what it is like to understand the victory of humility?) It swings both ways, Mike. It swings both ways. But then again, I guess I'm just one of them "conservative doctrine dorks" (tm)MM. BTW, I don't expect ANYTHING from God. I don't deserve His grace one bit. If He were to decide to turn His countenance from me this very minute, I would not curse Him one bit. Message: 65762 Author: $ James Hawley Category: Chit Chat Subject: Rod's post Date: 05/18/90 Time: 01:00:36 I think he said that he likes to FORNICATE. Every day. And as much as possible. Or that was the general gist of it. Message: 65763 Author: $ Rod Williams Category: Chit Chat Subject: last Date: 05/18/90 Time: 01:55:40 Yes, that is the truth. I also said that I like to fantasize about having sex with women that I see. I've always done that. And by the way, Cliff, I object to Peter Petrisko's last post wherein he said that I should stop thinking about my PENIS so much. After all a little Christian kid may be reading this board. Message: 65764 Author: $ Rod Williams Category: Chit Chat Subject: Holy Ghost Date: 05/18/90 Time: 01:59:33 Perhaps if I had some of that HG stuff then I could be like Paul, a true Clown for Christ. Or just maybe I could be like Cliff or Mike. Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. I think I prefer me much better. Hey, I'll just bet that the HG helps these people with their posts and all. Must use 'old english' though. All we poor atheists have helping us is Satan and he is so busy chasing girls that he hardly has the time. Good clean post here. (At least I hope it meets with the boards approval.) Rod